Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 01:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Dicdef. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a dictionary. Transwiki to Wiktionary. Neigel von Teighen 15:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article is a dictdef and while it could be transwikied, "rationale" already exists in a much cleaner version on Wiktionary. Srose (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and merge where useful. Shawnc 17:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Srose. Danny Lilithborne 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Looking at the short (but ancient) history of this "article", it seems that it will never be anything but a dicdef. However, the bit about the "episcopal liturgical garment" could be a valid entry if sourced correctly. Oh, and I removed the rhetoric at the beginning of the entry. Bubba hotep 20:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The article can be more than a perpetual stub. There is scope for further expansion. The liturgical vestment is now a valid, sourced, and separate article, which you will find at rationale (vestment). Keep. Uncle G 23:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Bubba hotep 08:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.