Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashtriya Secular Majlis Party

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rashtriya Secular Majlis Party

Rashtriya Secular Majlis Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only claim of notability in this article is that they have a member in state parliament. However, looking at the sources used, the MLA himself, Nawsad Siddique is actually from the Indian Secular Front which is only loosely affiliated, ie. "on a ticket", "borrowed symbol" with this party. Even if he's actually from the party, there's not enough significant coverage to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 14:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Secular Front is not a registered party. There is no name of this party in Election Commission of India's New Party Seeking Registeration since 1 January 2021 see - https://eci.gov.in/files/category/352-new-parties-seeking-registration/
I think it is a Double-faced politics played in West Bengal. If is not seeking Registeration then how Abbas Siddiqui launched party for election? See - https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pirzada-abbas-siddiqui-announces-indian-secular-front-isf-for-bengal-elections-2356170 and they also released there symbol without registration. See - https://www.indiatvnews.com/video/politics/pirzada-abbas-siddiqui-to-release-his-party-symbol-today-689141. If it is not registered then how Indian Secular Front article is live? The Wiki Mafiya (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does this political party meet WP:GNG and/or WP:NORG?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.