Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashmi Thackeray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rashmi Thackeray

Rashmi Thackeray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and WP:NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemant Dabral (talk • contribs) 14:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep passes WP:GNG ,Editor of Saamana and Marmik.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. All of these sources talk about her husband, but nothing about this subject independent from her husband. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete being related to a notable person does not make her notable.Serv181920 (talk) 10:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommentThe articles below are about her rise in the Shiv Sena not about her husband.India Today and The Indian Express articles give WP:SIGCOV about her.Clearly passes WP:GNG from clearly WP:RS and independent sources below.

1. India Today "The rise and rise of Rashmi Thackeray
2. The Indian Express Rashmi Thackeray: Mrs Surefire
3. Open Magazine The Rise of Rashmi Thackeray
4. Money control Rashmi Thackeray, the power behind the Thackeray empire
5. The New Indian Express Supriya Sule to Rashmi Thackeray: The four women who sealed the deal in Maharashtra
6. The Times of India Rashmi Thackeray: Behind Uddhav Thackeray's success a woman with dignity

The articles below her about becoming the Editor of the Saamana and Marmik.Subject is the Editor of the Saamana the official newspaper of the Shiv Sena and one of the most prominent and influencial Marathi newspapers.Note the fact the newspaper is family/Party owned does not affect notabilty.

1. ThePrint As new editor of Saamana, Rashmi Thackeray set to play more centre-stage role in Shiv Sena
2. DailyO What Rashmi Thackeray, Saamana's first woman editor, means for Shiv Sena
3. Hindustan Times Rashmi Thackeray is Sena mouthpiece Saamana’s new editor
4. Mumbai Mirror Rashmi Thackeray takes over as Saamana editor
5. Deccan Herald Rashmi Thackeray is new Editor of Saamana
6. News 18 Reading the Fine Print on Political Implications of Rashmi Thackeray's Appointment as Saamana Editor

The subject is notable in her own right as the Editor of a notable newspaper Saamana and there is coverage about the subject in the Marathi Language also.Editorship is notable hence WP:NOTINHERITED does not apply herePharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Saamana and Marmik are not notable independent media outlets but mouthpieces of her family-run political party (Shiv Sena). Besides these publications the subject is not associated with any other independent news media. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 16:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: passes WP:GNG [1] is sufficient coverage on the subject for this purpose. ChunnuBhai (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Entirely non-notable individual who's notability depends on the mouthpieces published by her own family. Subject fails WP:INHERITED, and WP:NAUTHOR. desmay (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the sources listed above are all independent of the subject and provide significant coverage to her. Passes WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The India Today reference is truly in-depth and appears independent and reliable, and should put notability concerns to rest as well. The other references are good support an also appear to pass RS.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:GNG. The above source cited by ChunnuBhai is aimed to provide coverage to Uddhav Thackeray than Rashmi. Shrikanthv (talk) 14:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral on the notability. If the final decision rests on my comment then count me among the inclusionists. For people !voting delete, I cannot see why this content cannot survive on her husband's article. At worst, this page should be a redirect to Uddhav_Thackeray#Family as a valid search term and to meet the CC-SA obligations.Walrus Ji (talk) 18:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.