Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raquel Romano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raquel Romano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr., the article fails WP:N, WP:MINIMUM and another notability criteria. It's a clear case of WP:SPAM, created by an editor with a long history of WP:PAID and WP:SOAPBOX. None of the source are about the author, let alone being "significant coverage". Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Brazil. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.