The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kubigula(talk) 03:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not really common enough to be notable. thisisace 21:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete A quick google for "rapid eye technology" turns up books, how-to's and the official website. No notability here. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 21:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. not notable Captainpanda 03:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
