Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Taylor-Weber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As this is the third time an article on this individual has been deleted, I'm pulling out the WP:SALT. --BDD (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Taylor-Weber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded for lack of reliable sourcing. Only sources are iTunes store and personal websites. After prod, the creator WP:REFBOMBed the article with references to other Wikipedia articles. I couldn't find any reliable sourcing; no hits at all on Gnews or Gbooks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have sourced what you couldn't find a reliable source too. Go look for yourself. and I deleted the other un-sourced material because it was undocumented on any sites. I got a lot of information from the real Randy Taylor Weber himself.I know him personally. Thank you [1]Elias.gatito Elias.gatito (talk) 23:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use word of mouth as a source. It has to be significant third-party coverage, like a review in a magazine or newspaper, a reputable website such as Allmusic, etc. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, well I removed it and put a reliable source which was the billboard music chart page. Thank you for helping me understand more about Wiki and sources. Elias.gatito (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The billboard chart only verifies that the song he wrote had a peak position. It says nothing about him. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will do as much as i can to find information for him and source it. It's more difficult due to the fact that a lot of this information happened in the 1990s. In fact, I removed it all already and put up reliable information with reliable sources including reliable sources about him. I really do appreciate your help. It helps me learn more about wiki. Elias.gatito (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The info has verified sourced and will be edited more in time to have more sturdy sources. Elias.gatito (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 04:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing is written about this guy - I couldn't find a single reliable source. Beerest355 Talk 20:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ if you look at the sources YOU WILL FIND INFO. THERE IS EVEN AN OFFICAL BILLBOARD SOURCE. THAT IS 100% RELIABLE.Elias.gatito (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reliable Billboard source says absolutely nothing about Taylor-Weber. Beerest355 Talk 23:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. I could find no significant coverage about him in a search, and the "references" in the article are not independent. --MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable artist. Koala15 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.