Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randox Laboratories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Randox Laboratories

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by (indef-blocked) WP:SPA RandoxLabs (talk · contribs), with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes it is badly written and PROMO, but it meets notability: here, here, here. EBY (talk) 00:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Needs a lot of work, but is WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does meet WP:GNG, but it was very promotional, so I deleted two promotional sections lacking reliable sources. --I am One of Many (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.