Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randi Sundquist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randi Sundquist

Randi Sundquist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sundquist was Miss Nevada. This alone is not enough to demonstrate notability. All the sources are from publications in the county she was from reporting on the one event of her being made Miss Nevada. One of the sources is a PR piece plain and simple. My google search for additional sources came up with a Linkedin article, an add page about her from her current employer, and not really anything else. Nothing to demonstrate that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:52, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This discussion was originally closed as no consensus because there is a lack of Wikipedia consensus on the matter on December 6th, after I presented some issues to the closer, and another editor argued that these should be considered on a case by case basis, the administrator who closed gave permission to reopen this discussion. I primarily state this so the time frame when this discussion has actually been open can be clearly seen. It was closed from early December 6th (about 7 GMT) to about 14 GMT on December 9th.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- run-of-the-mill state level pageant winner; in the absence of other notability factors, such pages are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.