Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana jesen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rana jesen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we are not IMDb. Films do not get articles just because they exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - passes WP:NFILM as it was preserved by the Croatian national archive [1]. Daß Wölf 23:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wolfy. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Daß Wölf above. Bot-tooled created AfD with zero regard to WP:BEFORE. Nationally released film made by major production company (Jadran Film) in itself demonstrates passing WP:NFILM. --Oakshade (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.