Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramayya Krishnan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep considering WP:GNG is not relevant or convincing if WP:PROF is satisfied and this certainly is with the Dean and Named Professorship positions alone, this AfD cannot be closed any other path (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 20:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramayya Krishnan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not meet GNG Mar11 (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has Gscholar h-index of 43, a named professor appointment at Carnegie Mellon, two significant awards, passes WP:PROF#C1 and WP:PROF#C5. Nsk92 (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as determined at the previous AFD, WP:PROF is met. SmartSE (talk) 15:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep -- it's right in the lead that the subject the dean of Heinz College; clearly meets WP:ACADEMIC. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.