Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Biasi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per criterion #1. VQuakr (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Biasi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article here is obviously inadequate, but the Portuguese version is longer. Machine translated, it still has only affiliated coverage. Failure of WP:GNG, WP:NPOL, and WP:NPERSON. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Wgolf should see this. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-yeah I thought it was interesting you said hoax when the foreign wiki has a long page, now I can't comment if it should be deleted or not, but I might make my mind. Wgolf (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If the subject of the article was indeed a national-level minister, then he's likely to be notable per WP:POLITICIAN. Nick-D (talk) 05:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Someone must have edited this because the article looks like it passes WP:GNG. Also, WP:POLITICIAN as Nick-D says.
Keep. Passes WP:POLITICIAN as a former government minister and a former member of the Brazil House of Representatives.[1] • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawl WP:HEY. --Mr. Guye (talk) 23:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SNOW as a "Federal deputy", i.e. national legislator. Bearian (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.