Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakib Mosabbir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rakib Mosabbir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are not from reliable source. All of the references are from unreliable, Non-notable news media. Mar11 (talk) 09:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The deletion rationale needs further explanation. The New Nation, The Daily Observer, Janakantha, Banglanews24.com, Amar Desh, and Risingbd.com are all major Bangladeshi newspapers and media outlets, reliable for the sort of information for which news organizations are usually reliable. Two don't have Wikipedia articles yet, but that doesn't mean that they aren't notable. Besides which, sources need not be notable to be reliable. The only questionable source is the subject's blog. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 08:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep we may need help from some Bengali speakers but subject seems notable, for now I am voting weak keep because I am yet to see more policy based discussions. D4iNa4 (talk) 19:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.