Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Jhaveri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Jhaveri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO - non-notable individual with no significant coverage from third party sources. A summary of the sources can be found on the article talk page. KH-1 (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 March 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is considered as significant sources? Being published in a major magazine or being founder of multiple companies and a charity is not considered notable? There are many examples of similar profiles on wikipedia such as:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepen_Shah http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selena_Cuffe

The profile follows guidelines of WikiProject Biography.

KH-1 has been biased on getting the profile deleted without any major constructive criticism or research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.11.53 (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't appreciate accusations of bad-faith. According to WP:BASIC - 'People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[4] and independent of the subject.' The existing coverage (as outlined on the talk page) simply does not meet this criteria. -KH-1 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.