Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Pandita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus obvious no need to wait another day (non-admin closure) — F R ⁺ 08:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Pandita

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This journalist fails WP:NBIO with no significant coverage found. The article was created in 2013, so I have reverted the draftification for an AfD to occur. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Prominent journalist and writer, won awards, received book reviews. Please keep in mind that Indian news sources are not showing up on Google News at present. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot rely, though, on personal testimony alone about a subject's notability. Let's not forget that notability-in-Wikipedia (or, as I like to call it, Wikinotability) is not the same as notability the way we commonly understand the term. Wikipedia demands proof through sources; in real life, it suffices that we know. -The Gnome (talk) 09:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

I added a whole bunch of sources yesterday, in the Further reading section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, having received reviews and coverage for his work. Capitals00 (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, is sourced well above GNG/BASIC - thank you Kautilya3. Could do with some editing for consistency, but notability is unquestionable. Sam Sailor 16:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.