Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Kumar Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Kumar Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources seem to me a PR material, and nothing such which may count towards GNG. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 06:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 06:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

• Delete: I did a reference check, and third-party sources provided [1][2][3] are partnered content (paid spam article). Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Some of the references look like press release, but some don't. Even the ones that look like partnered content may not be, because it doesn't have some of the PR type formatting. I added more web references from the google news to the article and rectified the partnered content. This personality could be significant in Patna as he is nominated for SAARC Awards which count towards GNG.[4] reljohnn (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)(— realjohnn (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. )[reply]

@Realjohnn:, Did you read WP:GNG? A single award nomination has nothing to do with GNG. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 18:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AaqibAnjum:, yes i read WP:GNG and did a research on this. He got ‘Startup of the Year in Influencer Marketing' award [5] and nominated for SAARC Awards[6]. Also, i can see he formed bihar's first influencer marketing agency [7] which may count towards WP:GNG.There is also an IMDb page of him stating he worked for Khajoor Pe Atke movie. [8]- reljohnn (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Realjohnn, Well, IMDB makes no sense, it could've been helpful if there was a case of WP:NACTOR, but the subject fails NACTOR from toe to head. Coming to SAARC award nomination, it is a too soon case. Bihar's first influencer marketing agency and it has just WP:ROUTINE coverage - nothing in well, reliable and reupted sources. No pass of WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 09:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep: I have improved the article with reliable references and information. - (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC) striking suspected sock vote Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 18:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete right away. Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. -Hatchens (talk) 05:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Weak Keep Qualify WP:GNG to a certain extent but a bit lack in WP:SIGCOV. -Patrickmee (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC) strike sock vote -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Patrickmee, and you failed to see that WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV have same target. A subject failing SIGCOV (significant coverage) fails GNG right at the moment. Don't play hocus-pocus. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Found few reliable references such as Navbharat Times [9] I believe the article does meet the general notability guideline - only businessmen of a certain reputation and stature would be nominated for SAARC awards.-ThePediaGeek (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)strike sock vote -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : All the references are spam because there is no editor name mentioned. All of it says "Partnered Content". Fails WP:GNG. The keep votes are from the socks, I have already reported them for SPI. This needs to be deleted. AngusMEOW (chatter • paw trail) 13:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusMEOW: I’m sorry if you think my account is a ‘sock’. I’m very surprised to see your response. Coming to the article, what i have shared is the ‘NAVBHARAT TIMES’ article with an editor name as ‘Ankit Ojha’ . I didn’t saw any partnered content as of now. ThePediaGeek (talk) 13:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC) strike sock -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete cross-wiki spam and promotion. --IWI (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails to qualify WP:GNG and all the links are from PR - Tatupiplu'^talk 14:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.