Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafiq Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rafiq Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-commissioned officer awarded country's third highest wartime gallantry award. Fails WP:SOLDIER and also no adequate sources. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 13:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still nothing else apart from that one award, nothing else to suggest the needed substance. SwisterTwister talk 20:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is one of four very similar articles at AFD, and all of them have had broadly the same level of minimal input so far. Additional contributors to the debate over the next seven days would be welcome. KaisaL (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; concur. The Vir Chakra is the third highest, and receiving it does not place this person past WP:SOLDIER. No other claims to fame in the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.