Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raffaello Degruttola

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raffaello Degruttola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i fail to see how Degruttola meets WP:NACTOR or any other film related criteria - yes, he was involved in some films that were nominated or appeared in festivals, but it was through his production company (which may or may not be notable).

Almost all of his roles are minor roles that are barely even mentioned anywhere outside of listings like imdb and BFI. Aside from his marriage to a notable actress, there is a total dearth of in depth, meaningful coverage of him. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Degruttola is the lead actor in House of 9 (just added), and Citizen Verdict, as well as supporting roles in many large movies.
- Film festival awards maybe obscenely common, but some are considered to be prestigious - including the British Film Festival, and Raindance and nominations are considered prestigious too.
- Will look for more citations.
Otherwise, should this be a stub? Rafffan (talk) 00:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations in and of themselves do not help for notability unless there are a LOT of them. Just two nominations are no good notability-wise. House of 9 has absolutely abysmal sourcing (and it, too, seems like it would be a perfect AfD candidate barring more professional film reviews). Supporting roles are irrelevant. There is no chance this becomes a stub - once again, at best we only have one plausible source, which means WP:Notability has not been met (since the subject doesn't meet WP:NACTOR so far as I can tell otherwise). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was involved at an early stage when I had to ask the author to stop canvassing editors in favour of their latest draft. I was convinced at the time that this SPA was writing an autobiography. I was surprised to see it elevated into mainspace since I can see no evidence that the subject is in any way notable. Fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk   18:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.