Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafat Hussain

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rafat Hussain

Rafat Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete fails WP:PROF. also WP:NOTRESUME. LibStar (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep meets WP:PROF LibStar (talk) 01:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete I don't see she has notable career. this bio seems like a resume. There is some coverage and namechecking in G'books so week delete. --Saqib (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Substantial cites of 3,600+ and a h-index of 31 per Scholar. Passes the notability test for an academic. Mar4d (talk) 07:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Xxanthippe: Can you see this case? Because I know little about GS. Störm (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.