Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Manila FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Manila FM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Radio station appears not to be notable, is no longer broadcasting and I cannot find adequate secondary sources. Note - there is a separate Radio Manila based in Italy which appears to be a different radio station. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Webcaster with pie-in-the-sky hopes of 'wifi radio' being a thing, which judging from our website access being from the WBM, it wasn't. Nate • (chatter) 07:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a semi-advertorialized, and completely unreferenced, article about a web radio broadcaster, evincing no proof whatsoever that it would pass our notability criteria for media. There's not a titch of evidence, for example, that this thing actually broadcasts on real FM radio at all, or that it has a license from the Philippine broadcast regulator, or that it has any reliable source coverage about it in sources independent of its own self-published web presence. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform for startup companies to publicize themselves on: there are notability criteria that a topic has to pass to earn a Wikipedia article, and one of them is the existence of reliable source coverage about it in real media other than itself. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Their website doesn't work. There are no sources regarding its existence. _SUPER ^ASTIG 12:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.