Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radhika Aggarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The nomination is by a banned sock. No valid "delete" opinions, hence no reasons to relist. Sandstein 18:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Radhika Aggarwal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a fair amount of routine coverage, but I wasn't able to find any significant coverage with actual independent analysis of the subject. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: Business Insider reporting that her company is the first unicorn in India, honestly is enough to be notable. She’s raised $257M. This should have been labeled as a stub and a more senior editor can rewrite it. Juju (talk) 22:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Business Insider Resource1 and Business Insider Resource2 have no "Independent Content" (fails WP:ORGIND).CleanAmbassy (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.