Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radhe Krishan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radhe Krishan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable academic, fails WP:NPROF and any other applicable academic criteria. VAXIDICAE💉 13:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep - Dr. Radhe Krishan is a notable academician. However, the page may be referred for improvement. There are multiple sources available online and offline that establish that the person is notable. His works have also been cited considerably. Therefore, the page may be kept with suggestions to include more references, links and citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masscommentators (talk • contribs) 15:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no sign of meeting WP:NACADEMIC or the GNG. There's no presumption of notability for former assistant professors, and his citation count is very low. My searches find no substantial independent coverage in reliable sources. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough to pass WP:NPROF. WP:TOOSOON at best. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet WP:NPROF. Too few news sources. Peter303x (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete academic career not notable, and not current government position, either. David notMD (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article has no sources, never mind any that would show notability. The "references" are all to his own publications. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.