Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race-of-work system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Race-of-work system

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

there is a tag on a article created in 2018 from 2015. edit history shows that this may be a copy paste. Author of article is creator. Can't find any substantial coverage of this JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 09:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 09:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I could find absolutely no sources on this whatsoever. Agreed that this is basically a speedy. Enterprisey (talk!) 16:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also could find zero sources. Without reliable sources, this topic has no verifiability and should be deleted. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; per nom, WP:NOT, WP:NEO, WP:SPAM and WP:TRIVIA. We are a charitable encyclopedia, and are not a forum for spammers spamming spam about the next new term used in bitcoinery. Bearian (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.