Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFX Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFX Interactive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unnotable company that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. There are some mentions in reliable sources that discuss their games, but there is nothing substantial that would come close to "significant coverage". I find a good indicator of non-notability to be when you cannot verify neither the founding year nor the founder's name through traditional sources. Furthermore, while the company developed some notable games, it does not inherit their notability, per WP:INHERIT. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A few brief mentions in reliable sources does not provide significant coverage hence fails WP:GNG. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 19:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here but WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES like content. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.