Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REDengine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to CD Projekt. Missvain (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

REDengine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game engine used by one developer for its games. It has received coverage, but basically only in the context of the (relatively few) games for which it was used. It should be covered in the articles about these games, because all information about the different versions of the engine is specific to one particular game. Separate from the games this is not a notable topic. Sandstein 18:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 18:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; no significant coverage and the article is just a version-on-version changelog. Lordtobi (✉) 18:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to CD Projekt. The engine name is a valid search term and we have enough to document it as tech developed by CD P Red. But what is merged just needs to be trimmed to the basics. --Masem (t) 18:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per the two stances above. I do believe it’s worth retaining as a redirect though, since it is a viable search term. It is a thing mentioned in sources, but there’s not enough sourcing or content to warrant a stand-alone article. Sergecross73 msg me 18:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because not a random game engine but a notable one with many coverage and used in popular games. Sambhil32 (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give some examples of significant coverage of the subject from reliable, third party sources? Sergecross73 msg me 20:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to CD Projekt. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to CD Projekt per everyone else._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to CD Projekt per above. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 13:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.