Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quy Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quy Technology

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and a WP:BEFORE search shows me links to user generated unreliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete It looks like to me a spam piece without any reliable sources.

No 1 source is a profile.
No 2 source is a press release.
No 3 source is a press release.
No 4 source is a press release.
No 5 source is a credible INC source but only the company name is mentioned nothing in depth. [Companies like Microsoft, Consagous, Quytech, RealWorld One, Chetu, Gramercy Tech, Scanta, IndiaNIC, Groove Jones, etc.]
No 6 source is a profile.

Overall nothing here which shows significant importance for this company. My vote goes to speedy delete. Grailcombs (talk) 17:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: After the new findings by Grailcombs Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 18:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.