Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quincy High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was keep. Mailer Diablo 14:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable school Benji64 20:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There is abundant precedent that (insert drum roll here) high schools are notable. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. — RJH (talk) 21:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep majority of community recognises that these things are kept and AfDing them borders on futility. SM247^{My Talk} 23:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment alright, i wasn't sure about the verdict on high schools, though i should note that just because they keep accumulating doesnt mean that the effort to purge them should not be made Benji64 00:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fact that it's a total waste of everyone's time because it's doomed to failure does. Merchbow 08:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep High schools merit articles Fg2 00:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Leave for now. Very, very short stub. I've marked as a stub. Article makes no assertion of notability, but is way too short to tell. I'm quite confident that the notability assertion at the time nominated "It became famous in 2001 after monsters from the basement stalked and killed three juniors." was completely false. I live in Boston, a bordering city, and that would have made the paper if true. GRBerry 03:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 05:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. Merchbow 08:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now due to the past precedent, but the article is very short. If we can get an article on the school district I'll support a merge there. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Stuff precedent, nothing notable ever happened here. -- GWO
• Delete nn school; and yes, I'll keep tilting at windmills...if all we did was blindly follow the first precedent we'd be living in caves, still owning slaves, etc..... Carlossuarez46 20:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Comparing the inclusion of notable topics on Wikipedia to slavery is disgusting and offensive. Silensor 20:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.