Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an unreleased film, not referenced to anywhere near enough reliable source coverage to exempt it from the primary notability criteria at WP:NFO. As always, we don't want an article about every film that enters the production pipeline -- with a few admitted exceptions for really high profile projects on the order of Star Wars or Marvel films, we primarily want articles about films that have come out the end of the production pipeline and been seen by critics and the public. But this is referenced to a couple of very short production blurbs and an unreliable source that isn't support for notability at all, and there's no prospect of increased coverage in the future. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to secure the permanent notability of a never-released film project that died in development a decade ago. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I find no sources, and it's been shelved since 2008, so we likely won't see any more. Oaktree b (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; Queen of Media is more common as a nickname than an unreleased film. If inclusion is warranted, it's best done as being part of a list of minor unreleased movies (if such article exists). InvadingInvader (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I also did not find any reliable sources. I agree with the nominator that per Wikipedia:NFOE the film fails to meet notability criteria as it does not have enough sources and it does not fall within the exceptions noted there. Jtrrs0 (talk) 14:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.