Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantity (metadata)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quantity (metadata)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for references did not find support for the term "Quantity" to have any significant meaning in Metadata. Searching the page Metadata does not find the word used in any context. It appears to a WP:PROD candidate but there is sufficient possibility that a larger community review may lead to something I missed or am not aware of, so bringing it here. Jeepday (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: and Wiktionary as def under Quantity. GreyWyvern^⚒ 18:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NAD, agree with GreyWyvern. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as nom. A larger community review has not lead to anything I missed. Fails WP:N and WP:NAD, no chance of finding WP:RS to meet WP:V is evident. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as a a very specific term likely meant to reflect its usage in a specific standard. See Representation term#Sample representation terms. This is very specific detail with no possibility of expansion beyond what is essentially a technical dictionary entry. -- Whpq (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.