Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quality punching
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. (NAC)--Antigng (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Quality punching
- Quality punching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company, found no independent sources. Conifer (talk) 01:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Not to mention possible copyvio. Adam9007 (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. CORPSPAM at its purest. We are not Yellow Pages. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article making no claim to notability for this business, nor do searches turn up anything indicating notability. Could be a CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 06:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.