Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QUnit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ --WikiLinuz (talk) 15:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QUnit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Cannot find reliable, secondary, non-tutorial type works about the subject. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Is this some kind of joke? QUnit was originally part of JQuery, and as a standalone its most recent release was February 2024. Even if it's not used much these days, it's historically significant and should be kept on that basis alone. Michaelmalak (talk) 19:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it's so historically significant you wouldn't have trouble finding reliable, secondary sources to substantiate its notability. --WikiLinuz (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google Books has 1280 hits [1] and Google Scholar has 421 hits [2] Michaelmalak (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added one of those as a cite just now. Michaelmalak (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Apparently, tutorial books are allowed to establish notability. --WikiLinuz (talk) 15:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.