Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Push Interactions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure)  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  18:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Push Interactions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable small app company, awards don't appear to be notable enough to confer notability on this company. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 19 June 2015 (UTC):

Many of these like the Branham are nation wide awards in Canada. We can add more information and awards if necessary but I don't understand why it wouldn't already be more than enough. The reference links are quite a bit longer then the content already. We can double it but it is already really long. For example creating Canada's first University app for students with iUsask. Featured in Globe and Mail, Maclean's Magazine Canada's top publications. Or one of the first to implement depositing a cheque through an app in Canada. Doing work for Team Canada Hockey. Working with TomTom. Creating Canada's first iPhone programming class. These are why some of those awards are won. Ding Free is used nationwide in a advertising campaign (about half way down the page): http://www.pushinteractions.com/media

Compare that to the entry below for example which isn't pegged for deletion. Compare the two which is more notable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetec

Also, consider this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers

and this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don't_assume_negative_notability

If you need us to add more let us know how much more. Or any other edits needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChadJones951 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.