Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pur (Belgaum)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk|c|em) 15:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pur (Belgaum)

Pur (Belgaum) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability demonstrated in the article whatsoever, only one source listed, and the entire article comes out to one sentence (not including a sparsely-populated infobox). - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 01:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:DEFACTO--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gene93k: I wondered if there was a rule like that somewhere, but I didn't see it in the books. Thanks for pointing it out! Show me as requesting discussion closure. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 14:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.