Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punch-Counterpunch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots#Miscellaneous. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Punch-Counterpunch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Transformers character. No decent sources cited, no evidence of real-world notability. Contested prod. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Autobots#Miscellaneous or delete. This one sounds like it would get more attention, but there doesn't really seem to be much out there. this book from F+W says the toy was popular, but that's about it. The rest of the Google hits seem to be simple price guides and unreliable fan sites. There's a review from cliffbee.com listed in the article, but that looks pretty obviously self-published. This belongs on Wikia, not Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Without sources to properly establish notability, there is no need for an article. TTN (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.