Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publius Enigma
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin) - view that subject is notable; no !delete comments. WilliamH (talk) 14:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Publius Enigma
- Publius Enigma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Promotion for The Division Bell. Not notable as a free standing article. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable as a puzzle, as an early Internet phenomenon, and as a manifestation of the Pink Floyd subculture. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Per Wasted Time R. The Publius Enigma internet buzz was a huge thing and, within the Pink Floyd fan realm, remains one of the most discussed bits in the bands history. Not quite up there with the Pig... but pretty close. Libs (talk) 13:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Keep - it got its own New York Times article [1] which is more notability than a lot of things on here... -Hunting dog (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw - The New York Times article does it. However, I think ad campaigns (and this was one, albeit a jazzy affair) should be scrutinized for notability. The whole point of ad campaigns is to grab media coverage. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.