Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protomen
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. RasputinAXP c 03:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original version of article nominated for CSD-A7 and deleted. Immediately recreated by in a more expanded form. Immediately nominated for CSD-A7 again. I'm not so sure now, so it comes here instead. No opinion from me.➨ ЯЄDVERS 21:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Quite non-notable band. Wickethewok 22:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- They don't meet WP:MUSIC in word, although there has been some discussion of its spirit of late. I note that their self-released album is in its third pressing, which indicates expanding popularity but there's no evidence of strong media interest or a national touring schedule. That makes it a delete for now. Ac@osr 22:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Recreation of recently deleted material, meets speedy criteria--152.163.100.130 22:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This isn't a vote, so an anonymous entry of "keep" has no validity here. However, if you could come back and give an explanation of why you feel this should be kept under our WP:MUSIC criteria, we would certainly take your opinion into account. Thanks. ➨ ЯЄDVERS 10:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. B.Wind 17:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NMG. Stifle (talk) 22:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.