Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proteus Conversational Interface

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proteus Conversational Interface

Proteus Conversational Interface (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ten year old stub that's gotten no development in that time. Unreferenced, except in a vague external-links way. Borderline WP:A7/WP:G11. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A ten-year-old WP:SPA article on a project whose domain is archived, and which seems to have left little trace beyond Wikipedia mirrors and a Geocities page. Happy to revise my opinion if some WP:RS evaluative coverage can be found, but as things stand this fails WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - SPA, then we will not have COI. No sense of WP:CORPDEPTH. --Quek157 (talk) 22:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.