Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promenade with a Neurotic Fox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promenade with a Neurotic Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. Has two sources, one of which is self-published (the Barbora Půtová item). Part of a small walled garden on the artist's works. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this is one of a group of three similar articles nominated. The other two are Soundproof Aesthetic of Luxuriety and Barbed Wire of Christ.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This "art" work is currently an online exhibition [1] by the Research Institute of Communication in Art, Brno. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the "the Research Institute of Communication in Art" seems to be the main publisher of books and media about Kristek, and not much else.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The books are a funded art project by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund according to Barbora Putova's page [2]. Looking at the rest of the www it looks like RICA have the archive of Kristeks work. Looking further at refs on the internet this work is not exactly notable by wp rules, so should be deleted or merged into Luboks page (which seems to have no mention of this art work!)Davidstewartharvey (talk) 11:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This non-notable artwork/performance fails to meet GNG guidelines. Netherzone (talk) 21:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. The artist's article Lubo Kristek is a possible merge target, but as discussed elsewhere, it may have its own notability issues. --Lockley (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge - there was some partial info on Lubo Kristek′s page I recently copyedited. It seems to me that it is not very notable artwork itself (I might be wrong, there can be more printed material that is not available so far, but we don’t have it now), but it is an important part of the artist′s body of work in my opinion. I would merge the information with the Lubo Kristek’s page so that it wouldn′t get lost.Bibliof (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.