Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Championship Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Sr 13 05:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Championship Wrestling

Article appears to be vanity page without credible sources that would confirm notability. Author of page Cwmoneybags has few edits outside of this page and its related pages [1], and is creating what appears to be a walled garden. Darrenhusted 01:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Plus three template are at TfD that have individual votes as well

Delete as vanity listcruft supported only by references to the author's own web pages. --Nonstopdrivel 01:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All as vanity, walled garden, and not notable. Articles also fails WP:CORP, WP:V, and WP:RS. Bmg916^Speak 01:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All NN wrestling fed. I suggest nomiating all the events as well, since they would be considered NN anyways (the same way we have deleted NN events of WWE/ROH/ECW/etc.). TJ Spyke 04:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ALL I placed a prod on each of the associated articles because they all failed WP:V. Prods have been removed by the creator of the article with no discussion or sources added. Article and all associated should be deleted. - T-75|talk|contribs 07:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all both the main page and all the other pages in this walled garden should be deleted as a vanity project that fails all the basic rules of Wikipedia MPJ-DK 11:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the whole unsourced walled garden; we have some indie feds around, but they're generally larger, more active, and have a bigger impact on the field in some manner. The events are definitely overboard. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Weed out the Walled Garden, and none of them pass WP:N or WP:V — Preceding unsigned comment added by SirFozzie (talk • contribs)
Delete all as above, tear down the wall. Burntsauce 23:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All + Templates, per nom and other users. Nikki311 02:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the entire garden per WP:N and [2]. Sala Skan 15:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all PCW seems to be non-notable, and by definition anything else about it is also non-notable. It's a walled garden anyway. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete them all to hell as per what happened with the ECWF. --SteelersFan UK06 23:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.