Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Fernando

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to delete the article has emerged. (non-admin closure) ——Serial ^# 12:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanka Fernando

Priyanka Fernando (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria - was a shortlived military aide attached to a mission in London AlbusWulfricDumbledore (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AlbusWulfricDumbledore (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Meets WP:SOLDIER as a brigadier, which is equivalent to general officer rank in countries that use brigadier general. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete while rank satisfies #2 of WP:SOLDIER that is just a presumption of notability, i.e that "they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources." I'm not seeing that for Fernando. Mztourist (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:SOLDIER since 1) he is a General officer and 2) is in command of an army Division. Cossde (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Meets WP:SOLDIER, as explained above. Edwardx (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the actual coverage does not meet notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:SOLDIER. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:NSOLDIER, but also per the coverage of the not-insignificant international incident that occurs when an arrest warrant is issued for someone on a diplomatic mission. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 14:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but consider refocusing. I see a lot of WP:1E coverage, but whether the article should be refocused can be discussed on the talk page. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.