Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Ravichandran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 01:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Ravichandran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unremarkable mid level police officer,some of he references given are not corresponding to her. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think there is enough mention of her in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. With the two awards she may also meet WP:ANYBIO but I can't be sure how notable those awards are in India. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Suyog ^{talk to me!} 13:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explain why you want it to be deleted? --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMHO, we would be setting the bar for notability too low by including this BLP.Sesamevoila (talk) 11:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Two awards including the Presidential award. Also see, coverages in notable and reliable newspapers/sites like New Indian Express, The Hindu, Global Adjustment Blog, Alpha Time, Deccan Chronicle. There might be more information/articles in Tamil language world web. --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.