Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Olga of Hanover

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article evidently fails WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. There is absolutely nothing noteworthy to say about the subject. Googling her is futile because she is just so obscure. The only coverage is in genealogical publications but Wikipedia is not a genealogy database; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. Surtsicna (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, royaltycruft. Geschichte (talk) 11:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comment above, WP:NOTGENEALOGY.Smeat75 (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility, WP:GNG, and WP:CHEAP, to Prince Ernest Augustus, 3rd Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, her father who was a member of the British House of Lords and a minor royalty himself. I note she was unmarried, and avoided publicity either by way of scandal or charitable work. Bearian (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.