Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Daniella of Romania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Daniella of Romania

Hoax page. I could find no evidence that this individual exists. None of the listed references, or any other source, makes any mention of her. Biruitorul (talk) 04:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:HOAX. No evidence this person exists. Refers to Michael I of Romania, but claims her father "Dorel" is the king. Someone with that name and her last name appears in a Glenview, Illinois police report, a suburb close enough to the Loyola University of Chicago to suggest some kind of joke. Michael I has no male children, and the Romanian government is unlikely to change the salic law for a deposed monarchy, so his heir apparent is actually Frederick William, Prince of Hohenzollern, a distant cousin. To forestall this Michael has taken actions, the description of which from his article matches text in this article with the names changed.--Dhartung | Talk 05:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Article creator is an SPA. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 08:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax, per nom. and Dhartung. JohnCD (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:HOAX. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Part of this article were apparently copied from Princess Margarita of Romania, which is about the actual oldest daughter of the actual deposed king of Romania. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.