Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Charlotte of Saxe-Altenburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whether to redirect anywhere is an editorial decision. Sandstein 10:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Charlotte of Saxe-Altenburg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no significant coverage in reliable sources beyond mere genealogy. If someone can find sources discussing her rather than merely listing her in a family tree, please cite them. Surtsicna (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to father's article, unless/until it too is deleted. No independent notability, but worth a redirect (plus redirects from other names). PamD 10:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility to her husband's article. I say merge, because there are three citations and a table that could be added. Ping me if you want me to do the smerge. Bearian (talk) 01:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I just removed a deprecated source (thepeerage.com) and a user-generated genealogy site, neither of which demonstrated notability for her anyway as she was just a person on a list. JoelleJay (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete she doesn't seem to be notable enough due to lacking in-depth reliable secondary sources about her. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.