Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premise (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After extended time for discussion, consensus has become clear. BD2412 T 03:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Premise (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the references are only notices of financing and personnel changes, and thus do not meet WP:NCORP. The notability of the directors does not imply the notability of the company. DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The article's filled with junk now but the original source list is good: [1][2][3][4][5][6] czar 13:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as they meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV based on CZAR. I also found some more recent coverage with a quick Google search around COVID surveys and data they have been doing. Needs to be rewritten as it is incredibly promotional. Redoryxx (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The applicable guideline is WP:NCORP and not GNG. None of the references either in the article or posted above meet the criteria for establishing notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
  • Announcements of funding fail WP:ORGIND as they are based on PR and announcements/information by the company and/or partners. The following are examples: Pitchbook, TechCrunch 1, TechCrunch 2 and Pulse 2.
  • Profiles of company executives (or articles announcing appointments, etc) which rely entirely on information provided by the company or interviews or which fail to provide detailed information about the company fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Examples are GovTech (profile of Blackman, no mention of topic company), GovTech 2nd (profile of Blackman, no mention of topic company), PR release EY of the year, Govtech 3 (interview), WSJ announcement of new CEO and WSJ 2 Interview with founder
  • Advertorials relying on company information/interviews which "explains" the company/product and does not contain "Independent Content" or fails to provide information on the company fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH - advertorials from Time, CNN, Wired and New Yorker
  • Mentions-in-passing in "Best Of" lists or other Announcements such as new offices also fails ORGIND and/or CORPDEPTH such as WToP new offices, Forbes "Best Startup Employers 2021" list and Deloitte's "fast 500" list.

None of the references I can find get out of a company-led PR echo-chamber and therefore fail our criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, in strong agreement with HighKing. NCORP indeed need be applied, and his characterization of presented sources as advertorials is spot on. — Alalch Emis (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Riteboke (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. 4meter4 (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.