Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Premama

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparent WP:CORPDEPTH fail. There are hits in legit sources [1], [2], but they are namedrops. Existing refs are largely either dead or not independent. Article has all the hallmarks of UPE. Tagged for notability for 8 years. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - MrX 🖋 12:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.