Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prema Sridevi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prema Sridevi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion nor to showcase a CV. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete:All the sources are just talking about something else rather than the subject. Some does not even makes mention on her. This seems like a puff piece to me. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 15:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The subject was accused of stealing data and hence would be covered under WP:BLPCRIME. This cannot be used to establish notability. The other sources don't satisfy WP:SIGCOV either individually or collectively. Fails WP:GNG and the simpler WP:BASIC. VV 15:51, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.