Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preeti Shenoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Preeti Shenoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources not reliable. There are no citations that verify that this is a living person or needs additional citations. There is also a tag on the page for the same. The sources provided as references do not verify the notability. Aa015 (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. What a nonsense nomination is this? There are no citations that verify that this is a living person – absolutely claptrap! She is well and alive, and when one of the first of 146,000 hits we see is Times of India calling her "one of India’s top-selling novelists", it's time to get to work. Which means, sourcing and building the article. This nomination ought to be withdrawn. Sam Sailor 01:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 01:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 01:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 01:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Agree with Sam. It does nto appear that a WP:BEFORE has been done correctly, and current sourcing should not be a judgement for notability or whether or not to send the article to AFD. Article could use some cleanup, in my eyes. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Perform a decent before search, put on a clean-up tag, perhaps do some of the cleaning up, and avoid a pointless AFD.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination  Aa015 (talk) 08:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.