Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precision cut tissue slices

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precision cut tissue slices

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on the block log and User talk:M66JX, it appears this article was created by a now-banned editor secretly working for Precisionary Instruments. The language is pervasively promotional, despite several editors making changes to tone it down. I'm not sure there needs to be a dedicated article on this topic, but WP:TNT seems like a good solution. -- Beland (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After further hunting, it appears this topic overview is also covered by Histology#Sample preparation. -- Beland (talk) 00:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all of the above. TH1980 (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional and far from summary style, per nom. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Noting that article quality issues are not determining factors in AFD (the promo bits mentioned above). But a separate article on this topic feels redundant. X (talk) 18:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.