Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Bikalpa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prakash Bikalpa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page has been repeatedly created and then speedily deleted. I declined the most recent speedy request, but I question whether the notability requirements are met. Since I can't find sources in English to back up notability and I can't evaluate the Nepali sources, I'm bringing this here for discussion. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: lacks significant coverage and fails notability. All the sources just have passing mention of the writer or the books. ~ Yeti Dai (talk) 14:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom. Does not satisfy WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 03:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator and fails to show WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Fade258 (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.