Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prajnana Kesava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 05:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prajnana Kesava

Non notable religous leader. Part of non notable religious institute. Sources quetionable at best. Sources to establish notability are lacking entirely. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 03:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable from non notable institution. Questionable sources at best. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to me to be at least borderline notable. References will need work, but I get a lot of third-party information off an initial google search. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Per Good Ol’factory. asenine ^{say what?} 04:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please feel free to add any sources you find. I was unable to find any reliable sources. If these sources are provided then I can see how the above votes for a borderline notable and a weak keep could be altered. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 04:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ism schism. Stifle (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem very notable,and portions of the article such as 'appearance' are written very,very badly. - Amog |^Talk 05:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How is Srila Prabupada's Sanyassa Guru non-notable? Also The founder of the Sampradaya that Prabupada helped found? Is this a politically motivated delete?Syama (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your hard work in creating this article. My concern is that this individual is a non notable. If his claim to notablity is simply his relationship with another person (A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami), then a Merge or a Redirect to that person's page might be more appropriate. Also, the article still lacks reliable sources and is about a non notable religious leader. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Culturalrevival (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Bhaktivinode (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.